HONGYANG GROUP Ecuador Technical Center

Fax: +86 (577)88097280

HONGYANG Group logo

HONGYANG GROUP Ecuador Technical Center , Discuss Technical Problem , Suply After Service Online of Fuel Dispenser, Please Regist Firstly

U103-C Filter


U103-C Filter


Body: Aluminum(spray-painted)

Technical Specifications:

Working pressure:0.2Mpa

Filter accuracy:30um

Maximum flow rate:220L/min


Features :




Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight Dimension

U103-C 18kg/case of35 19kg/case of35 50×28×35cm/case of35

products links


technical archives

    ents on metrological management. The chapter briefly introduces fuel dispenser’s metrological management and technical requirements, appraisal related and attentions. Article I Metrological management and technical requirements In accordance with The Law on Metrology of fuel dispenser’s legal management mainly includes following aspects: Model approval, initial approval, subsequent appraisal and inspection in operation. Model approval refers to an entire test, examination and assessment as to new model’s entire performance. Initial approval refers to assess whether or not the fuel dispenser made by manufacturer in accordance with the model having been ratification through a series of testing, as well as metrological performance with relative metrological rules and regulations. Initial approval really has two phases ?- approval combined with fuel dispenser factory test, and testing appraisal after installation. Subsequent appraisal is conducted after long time since initial appraisal, from which considerable appr fuel dispenser aisal period is set down according to related requirements. Periodical appraisal is also regarded as the continued subsequent appraisal. Fuel dispenser’s measuring performance within appraisal period needs to be examined, so filling station should deploy self-check standard instrument (no less than 20L) to examine and inspect. Apart from applied to fuel dispenser approval, JJG443-98 also adapt sample testing and pattern evaluation. Although there are two items of accuracy and flow distance ratio conducted in initial approval and subsequent evaluation, there are other technical parameters different from approval as for fuel dispen fuel dispenser ser made after passing pattern evaluation, including minimum calculated volume and minimum cubic variable. Several items reference to the pattern evaluation and sampling testing of mechanical hydraulic section of fuel dispenser as followed: Accuracy testing The testing’s purpose is to define the flow curve and verify the tolerance scope in which the allowed maximum tol

technical specification

    4   11.5.8. Message 8 (Reply to authorisation request)   Ref. Data Tag Format L (V) Note   D390 Authorisation reply code 8A E 1   D389 Authorisation number for a transaction DF C1 85 BCD3 3   D10015 Displayable reply literal FF E7 1F OC 1   D10016 Printable reply literal FF E7 20 OC 2   D10018 Distribution ceiling FF E7 22 OC   4  Note 1: If this literal is transmit fuel dispenser ted it is displayed on the ATM.  Note 2: If this literal is transmitted it is printed on the customer ticket  All rights reserved ? fuel dispenser Printed on 281004 10:10 4798   Ref : NT1118R1   MPA V5.2: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS   Nb Pages : 98 + 0 PJ   for the ATM-MONETICS LINK   Date :  POS Depart fuel dispenser ment   11.5.9. Message 9 (Transaction recording request)   Ref. Data Tag Format L (V) Note   D10037 Amount of transaction FF E7 35 OC 9 1?

we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.

    ically and militarily? Since verification will never be flawless, a consensus would have to be forged and then relied on to enforce better compliance with the NPT, a test ban, a fissile-materials control regime, and the conventions banning both chemical and biological weapons. For if these supporting treaties cannot be upheld, there is little chance that a nuclear ban will ever be considered. NPT outliers will also have to be prevailed upon not just to halt but to roll back their weapons production. And a moratorium on the use of nuclear weapons is unlikely to inspire confidence without one on missile testing—and the eventual elimination of missiles from arsenals too. Then there is the problem of what would constitute zero. Some argue that a residual nuclear capability would always be needed to defend against a breakdown in controls and a fuel dispenser break-out by one or more countries. In an imperfect world, deterrence of some sort would be necessary, if only to avoid making it safe for the sort of mass c fuel dispenser onventional warfare that blighted the first half of the 20th century. But how might this be done, and by whom? Without convincing answers to such questions, nuclear disarmament, a dream for some, looks more like a nightmare to others. There are incremental steps that can be taken towards that goal. But simply demanding it, without a readiness to tackle the practical problems raised by it, ensures that it will never happen. © 2006 . About sponsorship Death and taxes Gilding the elite Jun 8th 2006 | WASHINGTON, DC From The Economist print edition fuel dispenser Corbis Whatever its outcome, the battle in Congress over the estate tax bodes badly for America s fiscal future Get article background WHAT weighty issues were preoccupying America s Senate this week? Soaring health-care costs perhaps, or the fiscal consequences of retiring baby-bo